The hunting ground analysis
![the hunting ground analysis the hunting ground analysis](https://www.coursehero.com/thumb/5e07cf38aabda3ccdfc963296a247528f05015cc.jpg)
However, the documentary does successfully combine similar viewpoints and cases on the issue to deliver an inspiring call to action led by a group of students from the University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill. The Hunting Ground (2015) shines a light and raises conversations on the reality of sexual assault that occurs on college campuses amongst the …show more content… Although the documentary does not reveal much new information from what has already been proven. Clark and Pino have established a national network dedicated to justice, education, and getting survivors to open up and share their story. Using the Title IX, which according to Anderson (2016) is defined as sex discrimination in education requiring colleges to respond promptly and equitably to allegations of campus sexual assault. …show more content… Two survivors who are featured throughout the film, Annie Clark and Andrea Pino, take matters into their own hands by fighting the issue through awareness and bringing justice through the legal system. The issues surrounding the rape culture in universities is, they are not taking enough action on protecting the students. In 2015, filmmaker Kirby Dick and Amy Ziering released the documentary The Hunting Ground, which revealed the epidemic issue of sexual assault on college campuses and the schools official’s efforts to cover up the crimes. The Hunting Ground Film Reflection Paper PHLS 301 The Hunting Ground documentary is about the existence and prevalence of sexual assault culture in many colleges and universities. Farther than vision ranges, farther than eagles fly, Stretches the land of beauty, arches the perfect sky, Hemmd through the purple mists afar. Through survivor testimonies and student- led activist, the film follows several undergraduate sexual assault survivors as they pursue justice for victims.Īccording to a National Institute of Justice study, it is said that one-fifth and one-quarter of women will be victims of sexual assault or attempted sexual assault at some point while they are in college (Fisher, Cullen, and Turner, 2000). Roll out, O seas in sunlight bathed, Your plains wind-tossed, and grass enswathed.
![the hunting ground analysis the hunting ground analysis](https://i0.wp.com/www.realtree.com/sites/default/files/content/images/open-graph/2019/realtree-deer-hunting-big-pre-rut-bucks-hit-ground.png)
This highlights the need of further strategies to be developed so to encourage and support these countries to share hunting data.After viewing the documentary, “The Hunting Ground” (2015), this article views the epidemic issue of rape crimes on college campuses.
![the hunting ground analysis the hunting ground analysis](https://cdn.player.one/sites/player.one/files/2020/02/28/predator-hunting-ground-free-trial.jpg)
The present report identified some countries where, though the potential to share good quality data is present, the data collection promoted by ENETWILD has not succeeded so far (i. ENETWILD proposes the development of a robust and well‐informed data collection model as the basis for a common data collection framework. Eastern Europe), and (iii) the data should be collected at the finest spatial and temporal resolution, i.e. The following is recommended: (i) countries should collect data at hunting ground level (ii) efforts should be focused on data‐poor countries (e.g. We conclude that (i) sources of hunting statistics providing quantitative information on wild boar (and by extension, for other big game species) are lacking or are not harmonised across Europe, as well as incomplete, dispersed and difficult to compare (ii) a feasible effort is needed to achieve harmonisation of data in a short time for the most basic statistics at the hunting ground level, and (iii) the coordination of the collection of hunting statistics must be achieved first at national and then at European level. The least frequently recorded information was at the level of hunting events. Georeferenced maps for the hunting grounds were collected (total or partial) for 20 countries. The most frequently recorded information in the official statistics included the quantity of animals shot per hunting ground and season (24 countries) and the size of the hunting (management) ground (21 countries). Fifty‐seven respondents representing 32 countries covering more than 95% of European territory participated to the questionnaire. Heterogeneities in the wild boar data collection frameworks across Europe were analysed using questionnaires to explore comparability of hunting data in the short term and propose a common framework for future collection.